From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] generic/237: fix filtering for expected failure message
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:43:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140413124353.GD14599@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140413081738.GA5331@infradead.org>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:17:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 06:55:17PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Newer kernels return EACCES instead of EPERM when modifying an acl
> > fails. Update the filtering to handle this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
>
> I've not seen this yet. What exact configuration do you use to get the
> error?
I was using a 32-bit kernel, using a recent Linus upstream. The bug
was showing up for both ext4 and xfs, and xfstests-bld is using a very
recent version of the acl package?
If you're not seeing it, perhaps the most likely cause would be the
fact that I was using an i386 kernel, and/or the version of the acl
userspace package found in kvm-xfstests?
If you want a repro, you could grab:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git
and then building the per the README.
If you don't have a Debian testing system conviently to hand, you
could pull down:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests/root_fs.img.i386
... and then update the image to have the xfstests upstream version of
/root/xfstests/tests/generic/237*.
Cheers,
- Ted
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-12 22:55 [PATCH] ext4: add a new spinlock i_raw_lock to protect the ext4's raw inode Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] generic/004: fix filtering of expected error message Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-13 4:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-13 4:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] generic/022: update expected output after the test was renamed Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-12 22:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-13 4:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-13 4:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] generic/237: fix filtering for expected failure message Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-13 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-13 12:43 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-04-14 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 2:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-15 2:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-12 23:03 ` [PATCH] ext4: add a new spinlock i_raw_lock to protect the ext4's raw inode Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-12 23:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140413124353.GD14599@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.