From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Xen: Spread boot time page scrubbing across all available CPU's Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:54:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20140414155414.GA24906@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1397239681-16522-1-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> <1397239681-16522-2-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> <534BC8FE0200007800008540@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140414150402.GE23371@phenom.dumpdata.com> <534C1D2E0200007800008939@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534C1D2E0200007800008939@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: keir@xen.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , malcolm.crossley@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.04.14 at 17:04, wrote: > > I don't know of any real-life scenarios where there are NUMA nodes without > > CPUs. > > I've seen mention of such, but without encountering any I think it > makes sense to handle the case with the smallest possible amount of > (and most understandable) code. No tricks - those can be introduced > by whoever first gets annoyed by the process being too slow on such > a system. Heheh. OK, will follow the design you laid out. > > Jan >