Re: BBB doesn't boot

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:11:05PM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Very interesting results!  These are the results from the build hosts I have:
>   Fedora 13 (i686) - fails
>   Fedora 17 (i686) - fails
>   Ubuntu 12.04 (x86_64) - boots

Interesting indeed. I have no idea what's so special about Fedora host - this 
is the first time I hear about issues with it. I may try experimenting with 
different VMs once I have more time...


> Note that I routinely build for other targets (which does imply other, mostly
> older, kernels) using all of these machines with no differences based on the
> build host.

Same here - building for different targets with different kernels from meta-ti 
and on 32 and 64 bit hosts and never had an issue like that...


> I don't know what's unique about an x86_64 host, but it does seem to work.
> 
> I was trying this to see how the stock Yocto support for the BBB competes with
> building using meta-beaglebone which I've been using successfully.  Based on
> these results, I'll be sticking with the meta-beaglebone approach for now
> (not just for the booting issue, but support for my LCD cape and other things
> that aren't there in the Yocto kernel)

This is not a "Yocto" kernel, this is a vanilla mainline 3.14 kernel (as a 
successor to 3.12 work done in meta-ti). Indeed, cape support is missing, as 
it is still not merged upstream, going through numerous iterations... The 
point of meta-beagleboard was to work on cape support and such, with the goal 
to upstream it, while meta-ti kept on working on SoC and peripheral support. 
Due to different circumstances, meta-beagleboard still uses 3.8 kernel. Once 
it is accepted upstream, it will be part of the mainline kernel and one of the 
later versions of the Yocto Project reference BSP.

-- 
Denys