All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: fix formatting issues in sched_can_stop_tick()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:48:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140414224815.GA1877@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414183838.GF11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:47:41PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > sched_can_stop_tick() was using 7 spaces instead of 8 spaces or a 'tab' at the
> > beginning of each line. Which doesn't align with the Coding Guidelines.
> > 
> > Also it removes the *rq variable as it was used at only one place and hence we
> > can directly use this_rq() instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > I don't think rq = tihs_rq() has to be done before smp_mb(), in case yes sorry
> > for this patch :(
> > 
> >  kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 268a45e..13299c5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -666,18 +666,14 @@ static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> >  bool sched_can_stop_tick(void)
> >  {
> > +	/* Make sure rq->nr_running update is visible after the IPI */
> > +	smp_rmb();
> >  
> > +	/* More than one running task need preemption */
> > +	if (this_rq()->nr_running > 1)
> > +		return false;
> >  
> > +	return true;
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> 
> AFAICT the smp_rmb() is entirely spurious, arch interrupts should ensure
> consistency on their own. That is:
> 
>   CPU 0		  CPU 1
> 
> [w] X = 1
>     IPI 1	    <int>
> 		[r] r = X
> 
> Should act as if there was a full memory barrier, making it so that the
> read on CPU1 observes the write on CPU0.

Right, I have a pending patch for that:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git/commit/?h=nohz/ipi&id=ca981d9f87fe0f113ad972098cfe181180b3675a

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-14 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 16:17 [PATCH] sched/core: fix formatting issues in sched_can_stop_tick() Viresh Kumar
2014-04-14 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-14 22:48   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-04-15  3:59     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140414224815.GA1877@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.