All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:53:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415075310.GI11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534937F0.3020702@arm.com>

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:56:16PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset [1].
> >I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
> >thing easier.
> >-configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset)
> >-update and consolidation of cpu_power
> >-tasks packing algorithm
> >
> >Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to configure
> >the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level like
> >the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM architecture.
> >
> >[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121
> >[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239
> >[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449
> 
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4:
> 
> For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT
> machine):
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

Thanks guys!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"fenghua.yu@intel.com" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:53:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415075310.GI11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534937F0.3020702@arm.com>

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:56:16PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset [1].
> >I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
> >thing easier.
> >-configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset)
> >-update and consolidation of cpu_power
> >-tasks packing algorithm
> >
> >Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to configure
> >the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level like
> >the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM architecture.
> >
> >[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121
> >[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239
> >[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449
> 
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4:
> 
> For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT
> machine):
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

Thanks guys!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11  9:44 [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 10:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34     ` [PATCH] fix: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:34       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34     ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:34       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-08 10:43   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Rework " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2014-05-16  9:57     ` James Hogan
2014-05-18  8:04       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-18  8:04         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-08 10:43   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, s390: Create " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: powerpc: create " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-08 10:43   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, powerpc: Create " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 10:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:54     ` [PATCH] fix: sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54     ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-08 10:44   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 11:46   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 11:46     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 14:46     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 14:46       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 15:26       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 15:26         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-24  7:30         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-24  7:30           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-24 12:48           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-24 12:48             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25  7:45             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-25  7:45               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-25 15:55               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 15:55                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 16:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:04                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:05                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:05                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-08 10:44   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, ARM: Create " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2014-04-12 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-12 12:56   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-14  7:29   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-14  7:29     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-15  7:53   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-15  7:53     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140415075310.GI11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.