From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
gleb@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmx: speed up wildcard MMIO EVENTFD
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:04:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140417170426.GA9781@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140417123354.GA16748@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:33:55PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:50:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > With KVM, MMIO is much slower than PIO, due to the need to
> > do page walk and emulation. But with EPT, it does not have to be: we
> > know the address from the VMCS so if the address is unique, we can look
> > up the eventfd directly, bypassing emulation.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this only works if userspace does not need to match on
> > access length and data. The implementation adds a separate FAST_MMIO
> > bus internally. This serves two purposes:
> > - minimize overhead for old userspace that does not use eventfd with lengtth = 0
> > - minimize disruption in other code (since we don't know the length,
> > devices on the MMIO bus only get a valid address in write, this
> > way we don't need to touch all devices to teach them to handle
> > an invalid length)
> >
> > At the moment, this optimization only has effect for EPT on x86.
> >
> > It will be possible to speed up MMIO for NPT and MMU using the same
> > idea in the future.
> >
> > With this patch applied, on VMX MMIO EVENTFD is essentially as fast as PIO.
> > I was unable to detect any measureable slowdown to non-eventfd MMIO.
> >
> > Making MMIO faster is important for the upcoming virtio 1.0 which
> > includes an MMIO signalling capability.
> >
> > The idea was suggested by Peter Anvin. Lots of thanks to Gleb for
> > pre-review and suggestions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> Ping.
> Marcelo, any chance you could merge this for 3.16?
Applied, note: KVM_CAP_ number change.
FYI: "skip_emulated_instruction" breaks instructions which are composed of
other parts than just the 0-length eventfd register access, eg. rep mov.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-17 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 18:50 [PATCH 1/2] kvm: support any-length wildcard ioeventfd Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-31 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmx: speed up wildcard MMIO EVENTFD Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-17 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-17 17:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140417170426.GA9781@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.