From: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc91x: fix compile error when SMC_DEBUG >= 2
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:24:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140420012419.GA12770@gup76> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397880413.3106.2.camel@joe-AO725>
Hi Joe,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 09:06:53PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 20:47 -0700, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
> > When SMC_DEBUG >= 2, we hit the following compilation error:
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:85:0:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: In function ‘smc_findirq’:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:1784:9: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > DBG(2, dev, "%s: %s\n", CARDNAME, __func__);
> > ^
> > Fix it by passing in the appropriate netdev pointer.
>
> Perhaps verifying the format and args in all cases
> would help avoid more of these in the future.
Sounds good. I can add it as the second patch in the series.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
> index d1b4dca..a8302f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
> @@ -148,16 +148,19 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("platform:smc91x");
> #define MII_DELAY 1
>
> #if SMC_DEBUG > 0
> -#define DBG(n, dev, args...) \
> - do { \
> - if (SMC_DEBUG >= (n)) \
> - netdev_dbg(dev, args); \
> - } while (0)
> -
> -#define PRINTK(dev, args...) netdev_info(dev, args)
> +#define DBG(n, dev, fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if (SMC_DEBUG >= (n)) \
> + netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> +} while (0)
> +#define PRINTK(dev, fmt, ...) netdev_info(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #else
> -#define DBG(n, dev, args...) do { } while (0)
> -#define PRINTK(dev, args...) netdev_dbg(dev, args)
> +#define DBG(n, dev, fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if (0) \
> + netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> +} while (0)
> +#define PRINTK(dev, fmt, ...) netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
>
> #if SMC_DEBUG > 3
> @@ -191,7 +194,9 @@ static void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length)
> pr_cont("\n");
> }
> #else
> -#define PRINT_PKT(x...) do { } while (0)
> +static inline void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
>
How about the following?
Ok to add your Signed-off-by as well?
Thanks.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
index d1b4dca..796355a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
@@ -147,18 +147,19 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("platform:smc91x");
*/
#define MII_DELAY 1
-#if SMC_DEBUG > 0
-#define DBG(n, dev, args...) \
- do { \
- if (SMC_DEBUG >= (n)) \
- netdev_dbg(dev, args); \
+#define DBG(n, dev, fmt, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (SMC_DEBUG >= (n)) \
+ netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
-#define PRINTK(dev, args...) netdev_info(dev, args)
-#else
-#define DBG(n, dev, args...) do { } while (0)
-#define PRINTK(dev, args...) netdev_dbg(dev, args)
-#endif
+#define PRINTK(dev, fmt, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (SMC_DEBUG > 0) \
+ netdev_info(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ else \
+ netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while (0)
#if SMC_DEBUG > 3
static void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length)
@@ -191,7 +192,7 @@ static void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length)
pr_cont("\n");
}
#else
-#define PRINT_PKT(x...) do { } while (0)
+static inline void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length) { }
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-20 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-19 3:47 [PATCH] smc91x: fix compile error when SMC_DEBUG >= 2 Zi Shen Lim
2014-04-19 4:06 ` Joe Perches
2014-04-20 1:24 ` Zi Shen Lim [this message]
2014-04-23 1:20 ` David Miller
2014-04-23 1:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140420012419.GA12770@gup76 \
--to=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.