[PATCH v2] staging: imx-drm-core: skip components whose parent device is disabled

[shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo)]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 07:22:52AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:42:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 01:53:08PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> > BTW, can you take a look at the following two patches, or are they
> >> > already in your queue?
> >> >
> >> > imx-drm: imx-drm-core: Fix imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id
> >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/7/58
> >>
> >> This one now is.
> >>
> >> > mx-drm: imx-tve: correct DDC property name to 'ddc-i2c-bus'
> >> > ('i' is missing from the prefix word, and it should be 'imx-drm')
> >> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg321057.html
> >>
> >> This one touches arch/arm/boot/dts, which Arnd moaned at me for touching
> >> via the staging tree during the merge window.  So, while I can take the
> >> imx-tve part, I can't take the arch/arm/boot/dts part.  This patch needs
> >> to be split.
> >>
> >> It also means that the MBA platform will have its TVE output broken while
> >> the two commits take their different paths, but I guess that's what you
> >> get for this kind of sillyness about git trees having exclusive ownership
> >> of various files in the kernel tree - more breakage not less.
> >
> > I think Arnd's main concern is about merge conflict, which shouldn't be
> > a problem for this particular case.  The change on dts file is pretty
> > trivial.  And I assume this is a fix to be landed on mainline before
> > -rc5 or so.  Then I can rebase my DT branch on top of it.  That said,
> > merge conflict is not really a problem for this patch.  Arnd?
> 
> I'm not Arnd, but that should work well.

Thanks, Olof.

Shawn