From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.sysmocom.de ([144.76.43.93]:61394 "EHLO mail.sysmocom.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6817074AbaDVGg7zHwU2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:36:59 +0200 Received: from sangmingze-mail.local (14-98-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr [109.190.98.14]) by mail.sysmocom.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 612B153CB5; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ich by sangmingze-mail.local with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WcUK4-0007FS-FM; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:36:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:36:52 +0200 From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther To: David Daney Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Implement perf_callchain_user Message-ID: <20140422063652.GF15993@xiaoyu.lan> References: <1313022966-28152-1-git-send-email-zecke@selfish.org> <5355B864.7090209@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5355B864.7090209@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39884 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: holger@freyther.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:31:32PM -0700, David Daney wrote: Hi! > I implemented it for MIPS, the patches are on the relevant mailing lists. > Perhaps some day they will get merged. this was a ping for my patches from 2011. Is linux-mips following a different review/patch posting scheme? cheers holger