All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20140422112913.GB21613@lee--X1>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a4c5643..94f94d1 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 > > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences 
 > > between the versions, so we can keep track. 
 > >
-> > >  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 
-> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) 
+> > >? drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 
+> > >? 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) 
 > >
 > > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What 
 > > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply 
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ That's okay, thanks for clarifying.
 -- 
 Lee Jones
 Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
-Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
+Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
 Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 528c071..c62eeff 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,15 +1,8 @@
  "ref\0535635d0.8908b40a.6c36.ffffaaa9SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com\0"
- "From\0Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration\0"
+ "From\0lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v4 5/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:29:13 +0100\0"
- "To\0Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>\0"
- "Cc\0Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>"
-  Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
-  Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "> > > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper \n"
@@ -23,8 +16,8 @@
  "> > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences \n"
  "> > between the versions, so we can keep track. \n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > >\302\240 drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- \n"
- "> > >\302\240 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) \n"
+ "> > >? drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- \n"
+ "> > >? 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) \n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What \n"
  "> > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply \n"
@@ -45,7 +38,7 @@
  "-- \n"
  "Lee Jones\n"
  "Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead\n"
- "Linaro.org \342\224\202 Open source software for ARM SoCs\n"
+ "Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs\n"
  Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
 
-b26777c25277ce2a19300088e693a3e02f64d6dee9813efd1e54ba0af382cb0d
+6459d51717eb76c1ccff3de60caa32032915bf0da7212af09ae4b6ab4bdd5280

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.