From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2014-04-19
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:19:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422221958.6240077e@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53569BBE.1020707@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:41:34 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> I think there should be two changes to the autobuilders.
>
> - Reduce the % yes. With the growing number of packages, the number of
> selected packages is also becoming unrealistically large.
True. Currently the KCONFIG_PROBABILITY is chosen between 1% and 35%.
Should I reduce that to 30% ? 25% ?
> - If webkit is selected, increase the timeout with an hour. I don't know
> how easy that is, though.
Not easy with the current horrible script, because the timeout is
chosen in a shell script that runs the Python script that actually
generates the configuration and runs the build.
So let's say that I'll reduce the KCONFIG_PROBABILITY on one side, and
increase the timeout for all builds by an hour on the other side. How
does that look?
> It would of course be even better if the autobuilder would calculate the
> timeout based on historical information from build-time.log, but I guess
> that's a bit too ambitious :-)
Hmmm, sounds fun! But I'd prefer to keep the autobuilder logic smaller
in size than Buildroot itself, if possible :-)
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-20 6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-04-19 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-20 8:48 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-20 13:09 ` Mike Zick
2014-04-21 17:35 ` Luca Ceresoli
2014-04-22 20:25 ` [Buildroot] php / snmp / iconv problem Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23 1:17 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2014-04-22 16:41 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2014-04-19 Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-22 20:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-04-22 22:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23 7:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23 8:51 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23 8:56 ` Jeremy Rosen
2014-04-23 9:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23 9:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23 8:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140422221958.6240077e@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.