From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Zheng Z Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2] PNP: Work around BIOS defects in Intel MCH area reporting
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:20:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424072021.GA3396@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBRVfajbeWeaZRmv6SSWcX7DAuGCxfmrHGiUTPkbfxVMWg@mail.gmail.com>
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> > Work around BIOSes that don't report the entire Intel MCH area.
> >
> > MCHBAR is not an architected PCI BAR, so MCH space is usually reported as a
> > PNP0C02 resource. The MCH space was once 16KB, but is 32KB in newer parts.
> > Some BIOSes still report a PNP0C02 resource that is only 16KB, which means
> > the rest of the MCH space is consumed but unreported.
> >
> > This can cause resource map sanity check warnings or (theoretically) a
> > device conflict if we assigned the unreported space to another device.
> >
> > The Intel perf event uncore driver tripped over this when it claimed the
> > MCH region:
> >
> > resource map sanity check conflict: 0xfed10000 0xfed15fff 0xfed10000 0xfed13fff pnp 00:01
> > Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine.
> >
> > To prevent this, if we find a PNP0C02 resource that covers part of the MCH
> > space, extend it to cover the entire space.
> >
> Works for me on my Levono IvyBridge laptop.
> Thanks for fixing this, Bjorn.
> Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Just curious, what problems triggered on your laptop: only the
warnings, or did something get mapped to the undeclared area,
causing other misbehavor?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-24 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 22:17 [PATCH 2] PNP: Work around BIOS defects in Intel MCH area reporting Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-23 13:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-04-24 9:41 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140424072021.GA3396@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.