All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "L.M.J" <linuxmasterjedi@free.fr>
To: Scott D'Vileskis <sdvileskis@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Corrupted ext4 filesystem after mdadm manipulation error
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:35:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424203506.5fdee0d3@netstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK_KU4a+Ep7=F=NSbb-hqN6Rvayx4QPWm-M2403OHn5-LVaNZw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Scott,

  Do you think I've lost my data 100% for sure ? fsck recovered 50% of the files, don't you thing there is
  still something to save ?

 Thanks


Le Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:13:05 -0400,
"Scott D'Vileskis" <sdvileskis@gmail.com> a écrit :

> NEVER USE "CREATE" ON FILESYSTEMS OR RAID ARRAYS UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU
> ARE DOING!
> CREATE destroys things in the creation process, especially with the --force
> option.
> 
> The create argument is only done to create a new array, it will start with
> two drives as 'good' drives and the last will likely be the degraded drive,
> so it will start resyncing and blowing away data on the last drive.  If you
> used the --assume clean argument, and it DID NOT resync the drives, you
> might be able to recreate the array with the two good disks, provided you
> know the original order.
> 
> If you used the --create option, and didn't have your disks in the same
> order they were originally in, you probably lost your data.
> 
> Since you replaced a disk, with no data (or worse, with bad data), you
> should have assembled the array, in degraded mode WITHOUT the
> --assume-clean argument.
> 
> If C & D contain your data, and B used to..
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 missing /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1
> You might have to --force the assembly. If it works, and it runs in
> degraded mode, mount your filesystem and take a backup.
> 
> Next, then add your replacement drive back in:
> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
> (Note, if sdb1 has some superblock data, you might have to
> --zero-superblock first)
> 
> 
> Good luck.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, L.M.J <linuxmasterjedi@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Up please :-(
> >
> > Le Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:05:48 +0200,
> > "L.M.J" <linuxmasterjedi@free.fr> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For the third time, I had to change a failed drive from my home linux
> > RAID5 box. Previous one went right and
> > > this time, I don't know what I did wrong, but I broke my RAID5. Well, at
> > least, he didn't want to
> > > start. /dev/sdb was the failed drive /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd are OK.
> > >
> > > I tried to reassemble the RAID with this command after I replace sdb and
> > create a new partition :
> > >
> > >  ~# mdadm -Cv /dev/md0 --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=3
> > /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sdb1
> > > -> '-C' was not a good idea here
> > >
> > > Well, I guess I did an another mistake here, I should have done this
> > instead :
> > >  ~# mdadm -Av /dev/md0 --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=3
> > /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 missing
> > >
> > > Maybe this wipe out my data...
> > > Let's go futher, then, pvdisplay, pvscan, vgdisplay returns empty
> > information
> > >
> > > Google helped me, and I did this :
> > >  ~# dd if=/dev/md0 bs=512 count=255 skip=1 of=/tmp/md0.txt
> > >
> > >       [..]
> > >       physical_volumes {
> > >               pv0 {
> > >                       id = "5DZit9-6o5V-a1vu-1D1q-fnc0-syEj-kVwAnW"
> > >                       device = "/dev/md0"
> > >                       status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
> > >                       flags = []
> > >                       dev_size = 7814047360
> > >                       pe_start = 384
> > >                       pe_count = 953863
> > >               }
> > >       }
> > >       logical_volumes {
> > >
> > >               lvdata {
> > >                       id = "JiwAjc-qkvI-58Ru-RO8n-r63Z-ll3E-SJazO7"
> > >                       status = ["READ", "WRITE", "VISIBLE"]
> > >                       flags = []
> > >                       segment_count = 1
> > >       [..]
> > >
> > > Since I saw lvm information, I guess I haven't lost all information
> > yet...
> > >
> > > I tried an unhoped command :
> > >  ~# pvcreate --uuid "5DZit9-6o5V-a1vu-1D1q-fnc0-syEj-kVwAnW"
> > > --restorefile /etc/lvm/archive/lvm-raid_00302.vg /dev/md0 Then,
> > >
> > >  ~# vgcfgrestore lvm-raid
> > >
> > >  ~# lvs -a -o +devices
> > >    LV     VG       Attr   LSize   Origin Snap%  Move Log Copy%  Convert
> >  Devices
> > >    lvdata lvm-raid -wi-a- 450,00g
> >               /dev/md0(148480)
> > >    lvmp   lvm-raid -wi-a-  80,00g
> >               /dev/md0(263680)
> > > Then :
> > >  ~# lvchange -ay /dev/lvm-raid/lv*
> > >
> > > I was quite happy until now.
> > > Problem appears now when I try to mount those 2 LV (lvdata & lvmp) as
> > ext4 partition :
> > >  ~# mount /home/foo/RAID_mp/
> > >
> > >  ~# mount | grep -i mp
> > >       /dev/mapper/lvm--raid-lvmp on /home/foo/RAID_mp type ext4 (rw)
> > >
> > >  ~# df -h /home/foo/RAID_mp
> > >       Filesystem                            Size  Used Avail Use%
> > Mounted on
> > >       /dev/mapper/lvm--raid-lvmp   79G   61G   19G  77%
> > /home/foo/RAID_mp
> > >
> > > Here is the big problem
> > >  ~# ls -la /home/foo/RAID_mp
> > >       total 0
> > >
> > > I did a LVM R/W snapshot on the /dev/mapper/lvm--raid-lvmp LV, I fsck
> > it. I recover 50% of the files only,
> > > all located in lost-+found/ directory with names heading with #xxxxx.
> > >
> > > I would like to know if there is a last chance to recover my data ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-24  5:05 Corrupted ext4 filesystem after mdadm manipulation error L.M.J
2014-04-24 17:48 ` L.M.J
     [not found]   ` <CAK_KU4a+Ep7=F=NSbb-hqN6Rvayx4QPWm-M2403OHn5-LVaNZw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 18:35     ` L.M.J [this message]
     [not found]       ` <CAK_KU4Zh-azXEEzW4f1m=boCZDKevqaSHxW0XoAgRdrCbm2PkA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 19:53         ` L.M.J
     [not found]         ` <CAK_KU4aDDaUSGgcGBwCeO+yE0Qa_pUmMdAHMu7pqO7dqEEC71g@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 19:56           ` L.M.J
2014-04-24 20:31             ` Scott D'Vileskis
2014-04-24 22:25               ` Why would a recreation cause a different number of blocks?? Jeff Wiegley
2014-04-25  3:34                 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-25  5:02                   ` Jeff Wiegley
2014-04-25  6:01                     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-25  6:45                       ` Jeff Wiegley
2014-04-25  7:25                         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-25  7:05                       ` Jeff Wiegley
     [not found]             ` <CAK_KU4YUejncX9yQk4HM5HE=1-qPPxOibuRauFheo3jaBc8SaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-25  5:13               ` Corrupted ext4 filesystem after mdadm manipulation error L.M.J
2014-04-25  6:04                 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-25 11:43                   ` L. M. J
2014-04-25 13:36                     ` Scott D'Vileskis
2014-04-25 14:43                       ` L.M.J
2014-04-25 18:37                       ` Is disk order relative or are the numbers absolute? Jeff Wiegley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140424203506.5fdee0d3@netstation \
    --to=linuxmasterjedi@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdvileskis@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.