From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:34:14 +0200 Subject: [Cocci] semantic patch feasibility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140425163414.GA12354@katana> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > So I wanted to ask people familiar with cocinelle whether is feasible > or not to model my change as a semantic patch so I can start reading > cocinelle papers and looking at examples or if is too complex for > cocinelle then I'll continue grepping and manually change as I've been > doing so far. I would do it with Coccinelle. First learning curve may be steep, but once mastered, a very flexible tool, if adjustments are needed (e.g. because proposed API changes). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: