From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as
> well as runtime services support for efivars.
>
> It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next.
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies
already in linux-next.
Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch?
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as
> well as runtime services support for efivars.
>
> It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next.
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies
already in linux-next.
Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch?
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"matt.fleming@intel.com" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"roy.franz@linaro.org" <roy.franz@linaro.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as
> well as runtime services support for efivars.
>
> It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next.
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies
already in linux-next.
Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 16:09 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] lib: add fdt_empty_tree.c Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] doc: efi-stub.txt updates for ARM Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] efi: add helper function to get UEFI params from FDT Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 11:21 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 11:21 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64: Add function to create identity mappings Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] efi: Add shared FDT related functions for ARM/ARM64 Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 11:24 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 11:24 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64: add EFI runtime services Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] doc: arm: add UEFI support documentation Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: efi: add EFI stub Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 11:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 11:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] doc: arm64: add description of EFI stub support Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] efi/arm64: ignore dtb= when UEFI SecureBoot is enabled Leif Lindholm
2014-04-25 16:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 11:28 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 11:28 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-04-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support Catalin Marinas
2014-04-29 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-29 11:43 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 11:43 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-29 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140429134726.GH17007-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 14:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:47 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 14:47 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 14:47 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140429144713.GL26088-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 14:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <535FBD94.9040101-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 15:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 15:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 15:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-04-29 16:41 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 16:41 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-04-29 16:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-29 16:35 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140429114356.GK26088-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 14:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-29 14:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.