From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> References: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leif Lindholm Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Mark Rutland , "linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as > well as runtime services support for efivars. > > It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next. The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies already in linux-next. Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch? -- Catalin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> References: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as > well as runtime services support for efivars. > > It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next. The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies already in linux-next. Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch? -- Catalin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933404AbaD2K3F (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:29:05 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:55935 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756515AbaD2K3B (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:29:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:28:17 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Leif Lindholm Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "matt.fleming@intel.com" , "msalter@redhat.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "roy.franz@linaro.org" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" , Mark Rutland , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support Message-ID: <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> References: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as > well as runtime services support for efivars. > > It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next. The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies already in linux-next. Are the EFI patches in -next pulled from some non-rebaseable branch? -- Catalin