From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2014-04-28
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:57:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429125742.GA17873@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d2g0s1mz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:33:58PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > On 29 April 2014 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >> Let's just make clear how to contact us securely, when to contact that
> >> >> list, and what we'll do with the info. I cobbled together the
> >> >> following:
> >> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/SecurityProcess
> >> >
> >> > Looks generally OK I guess. I'd drop the 'how to use pgp' section --
> >> > anybody who cares will already know how to send us PGP email.
> >>
> >> The first paragraph under "How to Contact Us Securely" is fine, the rest
> >> seems redundant for readers familiar with PGP, yet hardly sufficient for
> >> the rest.
> >>
> >> One thing I like about Libvirt's Security Process page[*] is they give
> >> an idea on embargo duration.
> >
> > FWIW I picked the "2 weeks" length myself a completely arbitrary timeframe.
> > We haven't stuck to that strictly - we consider needs of each vulnerability
> > as it is triaged to determine the minimum practical embargo time. So think
> > of "2 weeks" as more of a guiding principal to show the world that we don't
> > believe in keeping issues under embargo for very long periods of time.
>
> Pretty much the way I read it :)
>
> The point I care about is a commitment to getting fixes out quickly,
> making clear we're not going to abuse "responsible disclosure" to cover
> dragging of feet and deflecting blame.
Well it does say right at the top: "we aim to take immediate action to
address serious security-related problems that involve our product".
I don't see how by myself I can make a more specific commitment.
If multiple maintainers can make a stronger guarantee, we can
document it (it's a wiki :)
It won't be easy to retract a promise once given, so let's tread
carefully here.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 7:42 KVM call agenda for 2014-04-28 Juan Quintela
2014-04-28 7:44 ` Venkateswara Rao Nandigam
2014-04-29 12:33 ` Juan Quintela
2014-04-28 15:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2014-04-29 5:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-29 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2014-04-29 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-29 11:20 ` Peter Maydell
2014-04-29 12:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2014-04-29 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-29 12:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-04-29 13:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2014-04-29 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-04-29 13:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-04-29 8:54 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140429125742.GA17873@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.