All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:06:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140429140619.GC59046@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398719099-19194-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:04:55AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> repair doesn't currently detect verifier errors in AG header
> blocks - apart from the primary superblock they are not detected.
> They are, fortunately, corrected in the important cases (AGF, AGI
> and AGFL) because these structures are rebuilt in phase 5, but if
> you run xfs_repair in checking mode it won't report them as bad.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  repair/scan.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c
> index 1744c32..dec84ed 100644
> --- a/repair/scan.c
> +++ b/repair/scan.c
> @@ -1207,39 +1207,38 @@ scan_ag(
>  	void		*arg)
>  {
>  	struct aghdr_cnts *agcnts = arg;
> -	xfs_agf_t	*agf;
> -	xfs_buf_t	*agfbuf;
> +	struct xfs_agf	*agf;
> +	struct xfs_buf	*agfbuf = NULL;
>  	int		agf_dirty = 0;
> -	xfs_agi_t	*agi;
> -	xfs_buf_t	*agibuf;
> +	struct xfs_agi	*agi;
> +	struct xfs_buf	*agibuf = NULL;
>  	int		agi_dirty = 0;
> -	xfs_sb_t	*sb;
> -	xfs_buf_t	*sbbuf;
> +	struct xfs_sb	*sb = NULL;
> +	struct xfs_buf	*sbbuf = NULL;
>  	int		sb_dirty = 0;
>  	int		status;
> +	char		*objname = NULL;
>  
> -	sbbuf = libxfs_readbuf(mp->m_dev, XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_SB_DADDR),
> -				XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &xfs_sb_buf_ops);
> -	if (!sbbuf)  {
> -		do_error(_("can't get root superblock for ag %d\n"), agno);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -	sb = (xfs_sb_t *)calloc(BBSIZE, 1);
> +	sb = (struct xfs_sb *)calloc(BBSIZE, 1);
>  	if (!sb) {
>  		do_error(_("can't allocate memory for superblock\n"));
> -		libxfs_putbuf(sbbuf);
>  		return;
>  	}
> +
> +	sbbuf = libxfs_readbuf(mp->m_dev, XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_SB_DADDR),
> +				XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &xfs_sb_buf_ops);
> +	if (!sbbuf)  {
> +		objname = _("root superblock");
> +		goto out_free_sb;
> +	}
>  	libxfs_sb_from_disk(sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(sbbuf));
>  
>  	agfbuf = libxfs_readbuf(mp->m_dev,
>  			XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_AGF_DADDR(mp)),
>  			XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &xfs_agf_buf_ops);
>  	if (!agfbuf)  {
> -		do_error(_("can't read agf block for ag %d\n"), agno);
> -		libxfs_putbuf(sbbuf);
> -		free(sb);
> -		return;
> +		objname = _("agf block");
> +		goto out_free_sbbuf;
>  	}
>  	agf = XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(agfbuf);
>  
> @@ -1247,11 +1246,8 @@ scan_ag(
>  			XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_AGI_DADDR(mp)),
>  			XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &xfs_agi_buf_ops);
>  	if (!agibuf)  {
> -		do_error(_("can't read agi block for ag %d\n"), agno);
> -		libxfs_putbuf(agfbuf);
> -		libxfs_putbuf(sbbuf);
> -		free(sb);
> -		return;
> +		objname = _("agi block");
> +		goto out_free_agfbuf;
>  	}
>  	agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(agibuf);
>  
> @@ -1295,15 +1291,9 @@ scan_ag(
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status && no_modify)  {
> -		libxfs_putbuf(agibuf);
> -		libxfs_putbuf(agfbuf);
> -		libxfs_putbuf(sbbuf);
> -		free(sb);
> -
>  		do_warn(_("bad uncorrected agheader %d, skipping ag...\n"),
>  			agno);
> -
> -		return;
> +		goto out_free_agibuf;
>  	}
>  
>  	scan_freelist(agf, agcnts);
> @@ -1312,21 +1302,34 @@ scan_ag(
>  	validate_agi(agi, agno, agcnts);
>  
>  	ASSERT(agi_dirty == 0 || (agi_dirty && !no_modify));
> +	ASSERT(agf_dirty == 0 || (agf_dirty && !no_modify));
> +	ASSERT(sb_dirty == 0 || (sb_dirty && !no_modify));
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only pay attention to CRC/verifier errors if we can correct them.
> +	 * While there, ensure that we corrected a corruption error if the
> +	 * verifier detected one.
> +	 */
> +	if (!no_modify) {
> +		ASSERT(agi_dirty || agibuf->b_error != EFSCORRUPTED);
> +		ASSERT(agf_dirty || agfbuf->b_error != EFSCORRUPTED);
> +		ASSERT(sb_dirty || sbbuf->b_error != EFSCORRUPTED);
> +
> +		agi_dirty += (agibuf->b_error == EFSBADCRC);
> +		agf_dirty += (agfbuf->b_error == EFSBADCRC);
> +		sb_dirty += (sbbuf->b_error == EFSBADCRC);
> +	}

So we'll detect and correct the CRC error in normal mode, but no longer
issue the preceding warnings ("would reset bad ...") for CRC errors in
no_modify mode. Is that desired?

I ask because it looks like a departure from previous versions.
Otherwise, the code looks fine to me.

Brian

>  
>  	if (agi_dirty && !no_modify)
>  		libxfs_writebuf(agibuf, 0);
>  	else
>  		libxfs_putbuf(agibuf);
>  
> -	ASSERT(agf_dirty == 0 || (agf_dirty && !no_modify));
> -
>  	if (agf_dirty && !no_modify)
>  		libxfs_writebuf(agfbuf, 0);
>  	else
>  		libxfs_putbuf(agfbuf);
>  
> -	ASSERT(sb_dirty == 0 || (sb_dirty && !no_modify));
> -
>  	if (sb_dirty && !no_modify) {
>  		if (agno == 0)
>  			memcpy(&mp->m_sb, sb, sizeof(xfs_sb_t));
> @@ -1341,6 +1344,18 @@ scan_ag(
>  	print_inode_list(i);
>  #endif
>  	return;
> +
> +out_free_agibuf:
> +	libxfs_putbuf(agibuf);
> +out_free_agfbuf:
> +	libxfs_putbuf(agfbuf);
> +out_free_sbbuf:
> +	libxfs_putbuf(sbbuf);
> +out_free_sb:
> +	free(sb);
> +
> +	if (objname)
> +		do_error(_("can't get %s for ag %d\n"), objname, agno);
>  }
>  
>  #define SCAN_THREADS 32
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-28 21:04 [PATCH 0/9 v3] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] db: verify buffer on type change Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] repair: ensure prefetched buffers have CRCs validated Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 14:05   ` Brian Foster
2014-04-29 18:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] repair: detect and correct CRC errors in directory blocks Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 14:06   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2014-05-01 23:27     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 18:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] repair: report AG btree verifier errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] repair: remove more dirv1 leftovers Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] repair: handle remote symlink CRC errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 14:06   ` Brian Foster
2014-04-29 18:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] repair: detect and handle attribute tree " Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 14:06   ` Brian Foster
2014-04-30  3:55     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-29 18:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-24  5:01 [PATCH 0/9 V2] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-24  5:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers Dave Chinner
2014-04-25  5:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-15  8:24 [PATCH 0/9] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-15  8:24 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 19:40   ` Brian Foster
2014-04-15 21:52     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-21  7:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:35     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22  6:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-22  9:10         ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22  9:41           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140429140619.GC59046@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.