All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Split apply attrs code from its locking
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 16:40:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140501144018.GA25369@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140424144832.GD14460@htj.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:37:34PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> > +					const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> >  {
> >  	struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs, *tmp_attrs;
> >  	struct pool_workqueue **pwq_tbl, *dfl_pwq;
> > @@ -3976,15 +3960,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> >  	copy_workqueue_attrs(tmp_attrs, new_attrs);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations.
> > -	 * Pin CPUs, determine the target cpumask for each node and create
> > -	 * pwqs accordingly.
> > -	 */
> > -	get_online_cpus();
> > -
> > -	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
> 
> lockdep_assert_held()

Not sure... Only a small part of the function actually needs to be locked. Namely
those doing the pwq allocations, which already have the lockdep_assert_held().

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-24 14:37 [RFC PATCH 0/4] workqueue: Introduce low-level unbound wq sysfs cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 15:37   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-01 15:01     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-01 15:02       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-01 15:09         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-01 15:13           ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-24 22:42   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-04-24 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Split apply attrs code from its locking Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 14:48   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-01 14:40     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-05-01 14:41       ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-24 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 15:30   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-01 14:49     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Handle ordered workqueues on cpumask_unbounds change Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-24 15:33   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-01 14:51     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140501144018.GA25369@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.