From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753509AbaEDU1k (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 16:27:40 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38488 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbaEDU1j (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 16:27:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 16:27:38 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/158] 3.14.3-stable review Message-ID: <20140504202738.GA25318@kroah.com> References: <20140504154029.975081050@linuxfoundation.org> <5366769D.2010104@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5366769D.2010104@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 05/04/2014 08:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.3 release. > > There are 158 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Tue May 6 15:38:47 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 127 pass: 121 skipped: 4 fail: 2 > > Qemu tests all passed. > > Additional failure is from new build target unicore32:defconfig, which fails > in all releases. The second failure is powerpc:allmodconfig which, together > with powerpc:allyesconfig, fails to build in 3.14 and later kernels. > Results are therefore as expected. > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > If unicore32 doesn't build on any kernel version, should we just drop the whole arch? I'd suggest the same for powerpc, but odds are, there are still users :) thanks, greg k-h