From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: Zeng Linggang <zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] readdir/readdir03.c: add new error number testes
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505163249.GD11256@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396350731.10607.12.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
Hi!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readdir/readdir03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Fujitsu Ltd.
> + * Author: Zeng Linggang <zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU Library General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
> + *
> + */
> +/*
> + * Test Description:
> + * Verify that,
> + * 1. Creat a directory and open it, then delete the directory, ENOENT would
> + * return.
> + * 2. File descriptor does not refer to a directory, ENOTDIR would return.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> +#include <dirent.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include "test.h"
> +#include "usctest.h"
> +#include "safe_macros.h"
> +
> +char *TCID = "readdir03";
> +
> +#if !defined __x86_64__
Why is the test disabled on x86_64? What about other 64 bit
architectures?
> +#define TEST_DIR "test_dir"
> +#define TEST_FILE "test_file"
> +#define DIR_MODE (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR|S_IRGRP| \
> + S_IXGRP|S_IROTH|S_IXOTH)
> +
> +struct old_linux_dirent {
> + long d_ino;
> + off_t d_off;
> + unsigned short d_reclen;
> + char d_name[NAME_MAX+1];
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned int del_dir_fd, file_fd;
> +static struct old_linux_dirent dirp;
> +static void setup(void);
> +static void cleanup(void);
> +
> +static struct test_case_t {
> + unsigned int *fd;
> + struct old_linux_dirent *dirp;
> + unsigned int count;
> + int exp_errno;
> +} test_cases[] = {
> + {&del_dir_fd, &dirp, sizeof(struct old_linux_dirent), ENOENT},
> + {&file_fd, &dirp, sizeof(struct old_linux_dirent), ENOTDIR},
> +};
> +
> +int TST_TOTAL = ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases);
> +static int exp_enos[] = { ENOENT, ENOTDIR, 0 };
> +static void readdir_verify(const struct test_case_t *);
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + int i, lc;
> + char *msg;
> +
> + msg = parse_opts(argc, argv, NULL, NULL);
> + if (msg != NULL)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "OPTION PARSING ERROR - %s", msg);
> +
> + setup();
> +
> + for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> + tst_count = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; i++)
> + readdir_verify(&test_cases[i]);
> + }
> +
> + cleanup();
> + tst_exit();
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> +
> + TEST_EXP_ENOS(exp_enos);
> +
> + TEST_PAUSE;
> +
> + tst_tmpdir();
> +
> + SAFE_MKDIR(cleanup, TEST_DIR, DIR_MODE);
> + del_dir_fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, TEST_DIR, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY);
> + if (rmdir(TEST_DIR) == -1)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "rmdir failed");
> +
> + file_fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, TEST_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0777);
> +}
> +
> +static void readdir_verify(const struct test_case_t *test)
> +{
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_readdir, *test->fd, test->dirp, test->count));
So you are using raw readdir() syscall (man 2 readdir) instead of the
glibc readdir() (man 3 readdir).
Are you aware that the rest of the readdir testcases use the glibc
readdir()?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 11:12 [LTP] [PATCH] readdir/readdir03.c: add new error number testes Zeng Linggang
2014-05-05 16:32 ` chrubis [this message]
[not found] ` <1399373430.3177.55.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-06 11:00 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1399427555.2397.8.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-07 9:09 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1399459901.2397.18.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-07 12:58 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] readdir/readdir21.c: " chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140505163249.GD11256@rei \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.