From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ABOMINATION] x86: Fast interrupt return to userspace
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:14:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507111422.GA8410@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVHj1rd=ma-dW8C9RNyQNj3smRAyevWJSQXmvgshbQb6w@mail.gmail.com>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> > Whatever. I got enough profile data to say that it seems to have
> > cut 'iret' overhead by at least two thirds. So it may not *work*,
> > but from a "hey look, some random numbers" standpoint it is worth
> > playing with.
>
> :)
>
> Is there actual interest in turning something like this into a real
> patch? It would almost certainly have to default off and no one
> sane would ever use it except for special-purpose machines.
The macro speedup looks rather impressive, and we've done ugly things
for far smaller speedups.
But I don't think it should be a 'special mode'. It either is made to
work unconditionally and can be a prime speedup to be proud of in a
politely disgusted fashion, or we don't want the complexity (and
future bitrot) of some special switch.
At minimum it can be a "look we want this speedup in hardware"
testcase to CPU designers.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 20:29 [ABOMINATION] x86: Fast interrupt return to userspace Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 21:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 21:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-05-06 22:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-06 23:37 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-05-07 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-05-07 15:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-06 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507111422.GA8410@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.