From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au, linn@hp.com,
hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:45:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507144551.GC21048@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398135407-30142-1-git-send-email-chaowang@redhat.com>
Hi Chao,
I was testing latest kexec-tools and noticed that I still see some
memmap entries on command line. I think they are ACPI memory and data
areas.
memmap=32K#8192K memmap=960K#8256K memmap=96K#2062752K memmap=16K#2062948K
memmap=32K#2096108K memmap=16K#2096140K
Is there a reason why ACPI related entries should be passed through
command line and not through bootparams memory map.
Thanks
Vivek
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:56:38AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> This patchset enables passing memory map via E820 map on x86 platform instead
> of memmap=exactmap. It's a better design and will solve the following problem
> so far:
>
> - kernel cmdline is limited resource and large machines tend to have many
> memory ranges that may excceed kernel cmdline limit size.
> - kASLR doesn't work with memmap=exactmap, because kASLR happens early than
> user defined memmap=exactmap takes effect.
>
> Unfortunately, saved_max_pfn still got its user out there (calgry pci, it looks
> like the only one). So for backward compatibility, I'm introducing a new option
> --pass-memmap-cmdline to force kexec-tools to pass memmap=exactmap, the old way.
>
> This patchset contains massive updates from the previous one. I take some
> suggestions from reviewers. I try to split the changes into smaller pieces and
> keep the whole change as minimal as I can so it wouldn't be too harsh to review
> the patch.
>
> Any comment is appreciate!
>
> v7->v6:
> dyoung/Simon:
> - more description for CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR to be 1024
>
> v6->v5:
> dyoung:
> - use nr_memmap instead of nr_memmap_p
> - .end inclusive
> Simon:
> - more description on some patches
>
> v5->v4:
> Dave:
> - separate add_setup_data() to another patch.
> Vivek:
> - adding comments for setup_data.
> - store crash memory range info golobally in kexec_info.
> me:
> -remove dbgprint_mem_range defination, Simon has merged the patch.
>
> v3->v4:
> Linn: check return value of malloc (use xmalloc).
> me: fix dbgprintf_mem_range.
>
> v2->v3:
> Linn:
> - do not free sd (setup_data) buffer.
> - reuse code in setup_e820 and setup_e820_ext.
>
> v1->v2:
> Vivek:
> - Use function instead of macro for dbgprint_mem_range
> - Do not pass reserved memory range for kdump. It could addressed later
> separately.
>
>
> WANG Chao (9):
> x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap()
> x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM
> x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to
> memmap_p
> x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging
> x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to 1024
> x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info
> x86, cleanup: kexec memory range .end to be inclusive
> x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option
> x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump
>
> kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c | 69 +++++++--------
> kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.h | 2 +-
> kexec/arch/i386/include/arch/options.h | 2 +
> kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86-common.c | 3 +-
> kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.c | 4 +
> kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.h | 1 +
> kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.h | 1 +
> kexec/arch/x86_64/kexec-x86_64.c | 5 ++
> kexec/firmware_memmap.c | 1 -
> kexec/kexec.h | 2 +
> 11 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.0
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 2:56 [PATCH v7 0/9] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap() WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to memmap_p WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to 1024 WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] x86, cleanup: kexec memory range .end to be inclusive WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-04-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-22 4:37 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " WANG Chao
2014-04-23 0:14 ` Simon Horman
2014-04-23 3:31 ` WANG Chao
2014-05-07 14:45 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-05-08 11:31 ` WANG Chao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507144551.GC21048@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linn@hp.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.