From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Freeman Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dma: tegra: avoid int overflow for transferred count Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:50:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20140507225016.GC20137@nvidia.com> References: <1399411343-12222-1-git-send-email-cfreeman@nvidia.com> <1399411343-12222-4-git-send-email-cfreeman@nvidia.com> <536A61A3.3050601@wwwdotorg.org> <536A865B.1060007@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <536A865B.1060007@metafoo.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Stephen Warren , Laxman Dewangan , Stephen Warren , "vinod.koul@intel.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:15:39PM -0700, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 05/07/2014 06:38 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 05/06/2014 03:22 PM, Christopher Freeman wrote: > >> bytes_transferred will overflow during long audio playbacks. Since > >> the driver only ever consults this value modulo bytes_requested, store the > >> value modulo bytes_requested. > > > > The audio driver may only interpret the value modulo bytes_requested, > > but what about other drivers such as the high-speed UART (and SPI?) drivers? > > > > What is the dmaengine API's design requirement here, and what do other > > dmaengine drivers do. If it's to store the modulo, then I'm fine with > > this change. > > Yep, this part of the API. The residue should be between transfer length and > 0. While 0 is special and should only be returned if the transfer has > finished. For cyclic transfers this means it should never be zero. So if > transferred_bytes is incremented modulo length and residue is length - > transferred_bytes you get the correct result. > What each driver receives remains unchanged here. bytes_transferred is only ever read modulo bytes_requested in all cases (audio, spi, uart) This shifts that part of the calculation to the assignment. I guess this is a roundabout way of saying it's not any more wrong than it could have possibly been before. We can rename "bytes_transferred" to something like "residue" or "segment_residue" though.