From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFSD: Don't clear SUID/SGID after root writing data
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:12:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140508161256.GC20976@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5351501B.1010507@gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:17:31AM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> SUID/SGID is not cleared after writing data with (root, local ext4),
> #touch test; chmod 4777 test; stat test; echo 1234 > test; stat test;
> File: ‘test’
> Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 regular
> empty file
> Device: 803h/2051d Inode: 1200137 Links: 1
> Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
> Context: unconfined_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0
> Access: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
> Modify: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
> Change: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.026030285 +0800
> Birth: -
> File: ‘test’
> Size: 5 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
> Device: 803h/2051d Inode: 1200137 Links: 1
> Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
> Context: unconfined_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0
> Access: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
> Modify: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.040032065 +0800
> Change: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.040032065 +0800
> Birth: -
>
> With no_root_squash, (root, remote ext4), SUID/SGID are cleared,
> #touch test; chmod 4777 test; stat test; echo 1234 > test; stat test;
> File: ‘test’
> Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 262144 regular
> empty file
> Device: 24h/36d Inode: 786439 Links: 1
> Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx) Uid: ( 1000/ test) Gid: ( 1000/ test)
> Context: system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0
> Access: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
> Modify: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
> Change: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.168806749 +0800
> Birth: -
> File: ‘test’
> Size: 5 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 262144 regular file
> Device: 24h/36d Inode: 786439 Links: 1
> Access: (0777/-rwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 1000/ test) Gid: ( 1000/ test)
> Context: system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0
> Access: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
> Modify: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.184808783 +0800
> Change: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.184808783 +0800
> Birth: -
>
> This patch drops codes that kills SGID/SUID visibly,
> because vfs_writev() can kills it if necessary.
>
> With this patch, the above problem will not exist.
I'd like to apply this if only to remove the redundant code.
I'd like to understand, though, whether this is something that caused an
actual practical problem for someone, or if you just happened to notice
the inconsistency between nfs and ext4 behavior?
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 16f0673..6aaa305 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -857,20 +857,6 @@ nfsd_vfs_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> svc_fh *fhp, struct file *file,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void kill_suid(struct dentry *dentry)
> -{
> - struct iattr ia;
> - ia.ia_valid = ATTR_KILL_SUID | ATTR_KILL_SGID | ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> - /*
> - * Note we call this on write, so notify_change will not
> - * encounter any conflicting delegations:
> - */
> - notify_change(dentry, &ia, NULL);
> - mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Gathered writes: If another process is currently writing to the file,
> * there's a high chance this is another nfsd (triggered by a bulk write
> @@ -942,10 +928,6 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> svc_fh *fhp, struct file *file,
> nfsdstats.io_write += host_err;
> fsnotify_modify(file);
>
> - /* clear setuid/setgid flag after write */
> - if (inode->i_mode & (S_ISUID | S_ISGID))
> - kill_suid(dentry);
> -
> if (stable) {
> if (use_wgather)
> host_err = wait_for_concurrent_writes(file);
> --
> 1.9.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-13 15:11 [PATCH] NFSD: Checking whether kill_suid by should_remove_suid() Kinglong Mee
2014-04-18 13:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-04-18 13:51 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-04-18 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] NFSD: Don't clear SUID/SGID after root writing data Kinglong Mee
2014-05-08 16:12 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2014-05-09 7:55 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-05-09 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-05-10 5:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-16 7:31 ` Kinglong Mee
2014-05-16 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-18 16:25 ` [PATCH] NFSD: Checking whether kill_suid by should_remove_suid() Kinglong Mee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140508161256.GC20976@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.