All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-05-09
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 07:34:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140511043405.GB4096@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536E86B1.4050005@mind.be>

Hi Arnout,

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:06:09PM +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> >       i686 |            host-protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cc7873842959a5ba3222c9e70e8b1513d8936d71/
> >       i686 |            host-protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/73811fc73253aecec5560ebf5ccfa52e28e01d6a/
> >       i686 |            host-protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/0d1b1baff85de54902d9c07ff41913f49d89042b/
> >       i686 |            host-protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/11b92a8fec6aae0839ece48b2ed5e58a159f24c5/
> 
>  This one is on the powerpc autobuilders; it reports:
> 
> In file included from ./google/protobuf/stubs/atomicops.h:59:0,
>                  from google/protobuf/stubs/atomicops_internals_x86_gcc.cc:36:
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h:61:2: error: #error Host architecture
> was not detected as supported by protobuf
> 
> The weird thing is that the header file has:
> 
> #elif defined(__ppc__)
> #define GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_ARCH_PPC 1
> #define GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_ARCH_32_BIT 1
> #else
> #error Host architecture was not detected as supported by protobuf
> #endif
> 
>  So why is __ppc__ not defined?

It's __PPC__ on toolchains I have access to.

>  Note that it will still fail anyway, because in atomicops.h, there seems to 
>  be no powerpc support.

Correct. As I mentioned at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/347044/, the 
patch from http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488 adds powerpc 
support, but it uses gcc internal atomic operations, so it is only applicable 
to gcc 4.7+.

>  I guess that means that protobuf should be blacklisted?

Probably.

> >     xtensa |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ae9fa612d0b6c9d593504206d5cedd480ad2547e/
> >    powerpc |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2606a545b3962eebe1331fed701552c2b3dbe097/
> >        sh4 |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/bcdd448b364dbca32779491fe4535dd04d61e411/
> >    powerpc |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/4d2aea1cdd7f40ab606382210fea5843ae72fea4/
> >   mips64el |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/f906d803473e99decf75928b18ff63a90bb1e41f/
> >    powerpc |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2d7502dded4e1dee6fa152183ce170e9cce81cbd/
> >    powerpc |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/4c3ab411e5f2a7acb68197548742de0bea2571ec/
> >    powerpc |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/3a0d5224e8804ea1c4fb158d47b1dc61f9c4bae9/
> >       mips |                 protobuf-2.5.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/78c6071f1c49440b9e7bf192867c209885ccedd5/
> 
>  All these architectures are not supported by the atomicops.
> 
>  I'll cook a patch.

Your patch is correct, I guess, but as far as I understand it doesn't solve 
the host architecture dependency problem that is causing the host-protobuf 
failure above.

baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-11  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-10  6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-05-09 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-10 20:06 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-05-11  4:34   ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2014-05-11 14:42     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-05-11 14:55       ` Baruch Siach
2014-05-11 20:41         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-05-11 20:47           ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-05-11 16:00       ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-05-11 22:03       ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140511043405.GB4096@tarshish \
    --to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.