From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" <weidong.huang@huawei.com>,
"gleb@redhat.com" <gleb@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"avi.kivity@gmail.com" <avi.kivity@gmail.com>,
"Herongguang (Stephen)" <herongguang.he@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] vhost: Can we change synchronize_rcu to call_rcu in vhost_set_memory() in vhost kernel module?
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:18:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140512101844.GC15514@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53709F01.8090204@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/05/2014 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:57:32AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>Perhaps we can check for cases where only the address is changing,
> >>and poke at an existing struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry without
> >>doing any RCU synchronization?
> >
> >I suspect interrupts can get lost then: e.g. if address didn't match any
> >cpus, now it matches some. No?
>
> Can you explain the problem more verbosely? :)
>
> Multiple writers would still be protected by the mutex, so you
> cannot have an "in-place update" writer racing with a "copy the
> array" writer.
>
> Paolo
I am not sure really.
I'm worried about reader vs writer.
If reader sees a stale msi value msi will be sent to a wrong
address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-09 1:57 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] vhost: Can we change synchronize_rcu to call_rcu in vhost_set_memory() in vhost kernel module? Gonglei (Arei)
2014-05-09 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-09 9:04 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2014-05-09 9:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 9:28 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2014-05-12 9:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 10:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-12 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 10:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-05-12 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-12 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 12:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-12 12:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-12 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 10:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-13 7:03 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2014-05-13 8:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-05-13 7:01 ` Gonglei (Arei)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140512101844.GC15514@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=herongguang.he@huawei.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.