From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjrvZ-00030v-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 11:14:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjrvU-0006yr-92 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 11:14:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjrvT-0006yg-Vp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 11:14:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:13:56 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20140512151356.GC4371@noname.redhat.com> References: <1399898143-28288-1-git-send-email-ncmike@ncultra.org> <5370E340.5090401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5370E340.5090401@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add backing file option to qemu-img create help. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Mike Day , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 12.05.2014 um 17:05 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 05/12/2014 06:35 AM, Mike Day wrote: > > For the create subcommand the backing file (-b) option is documented > > on-line but not in the binary. Add it. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Mike Day > > --- > > qemu-img-cmds.hx | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/qemu-img-cmds.hx b/qemu-img-cmds.hx > > index d029609..7724709 100644 > > --- a/qemu-img-cmds.hx > > +++ b/qemu-img-cmds.hx > > @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ STEXI > > ETEXI > > =20 > > DEF("create", img_create, > > - "create [-q] [-f fmt] [-o options] filename [size]") > > + "create [-q] [-f fmt] [-b backing-file] [-o options] filename [siz= e]") > > STEXI > > -@item create [-q] [-f @var{fmt}] [-o @var{options}] @var{filename} [@v= ar{size}] > > +@item create [-q] [-f @var{fmt}] [-b @var{backing_file}] [-o @var{opti= ons}] @var{filename} [@var{size}] >=20 > There are two spellings for this: >=20 > -b file > -o backing_file=3Dfile >=20 > is -o considered to be preferred over -b, as an explanation for why it > is not documented? Yes, it is. -b was documented before -o backing_file existed. Commit 8063d0fe removed it. Kevin --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTcOU0AAoJEH8JsnLIjy/WCqcQAJcodtkrUr/8AcAFyOlp24xW Y+DkMGzBXCONcTZsQXDwIiRE+FD7o/FAAc3Ai4aevw8KJd1zaIfwouyxqS1PQWP4 6bNJKitkL26JgVk/0o59t5/4MeZGL1xBAAXobMmjQTxuL8Z/utaD7gxyEVwIvRmo 6MssTud8DLBfU7LXyHmN+k/Fr8PQRzk3wBFzak391gtvbnqMH6q57Ch0cNo6kJ/9 yOHWG9NkU26AaUztJHAsIsJGqnlD8yhw5pOBfl3ikQy0toSUYfhQytlbTJW1YzfL WssTjgadjJIUTbroEmY0UJSjY5i38MMSI1c4Wluxrc6Llt3JpsJZUi+VKxgQZLee DlmNpNtmg3X5lEiZPRW3YR2xXYgUjc3dqqYklqWCpHo969w9kJsmKfpLXRc9Ck8A Hn5dqQ7IWvmLKMHG68jgvOWOYZRvB4jAQCf3XnmrsGd06H2NSuuC3N4khFaD4tAO yXpbZbuJ+OAnZcePqbkWESJHvcs6huV/9UG0sTNYdS70tVczX3q/aOXhT4uP04tM rC5M9oZs0c4eHDZog5TvN9nafryNloDMXpnr1MwTYQBMwoaeLUW/f04nAoVPklZb de4HIrqRTmJzo+e7bOBpbN3lPfWlEMeWPKmU22DV46uPHKxTYPk2R1+2c/QNI2eU Rc0g8JbY0lW7/ddm16Qe =aF7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--