From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dma,x86,xen: fix dma_get_required_mask() when dma != phys address
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 11:28:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140512152858.GI2837@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399889742-26165-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:15:40AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> x86 uses the generic dma_get_required_mask() which assumes that DMA
> address == physical address. For Xen PV guests this is not the case
> and certain drivers will cause excessive use of the SWIOTLB.
>
> Patch #1 is a straight forward refactoring of a common function.
>
> Patch #2 addes the required arch-specific implementation of
> dma_get_required_mask() to x86.
David,
Thank you for taking a look at that. If you would like, you can
tack on Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
And with the *SWIOTLB maintainer hat on - you can add that tag
as well.
Thanks!
>
> David
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 10:15 [PATCH 0/2] dma,x86,xen: fix dma_get_required_mask() when dma != phys address David Vrabel
2014-05-12 10:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-05-12 10:15 ` David Vrabel
2014-05-12 10:15 ` David Vrabel
2014-05-12 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86,xen: correct dma_get_required_mask() for Xen PV guests David Vrabel
2014-05-12 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, xen: " David Vrabel
2014-05-12 15:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-05-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] dma, x86, xen: fix dma_get_required_mask() when dma != phys address Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-12 10:15 David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140512152858.GI2837@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.