From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [next PATCH 0/5] net: tcp: DCTCP congestion control algorithm Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:45:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20140512214515.7eb085af@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1399928384-24143-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Westphal , netdev To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:44826 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbaEMEpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 00:45:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id lj1so9770634pab.28 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 21:45:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:01:52 -0700 Cong Wang wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Florian Westphal wrote: > > This patch series adds support for the Datacenter TCP (DCTCP) congestion > > control algorithm. > > > > Please see individual patches' changelog for the details. A summary > > of DCTCP and test results can be found in patch 5. > > > > Is DCTCP draft accepted by IETF? It looks like there is some issue > with the design: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg08693.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Far more worrying is the Microsoft IPR statement relative to the RFC. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2319/