From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use ilk_wm_max_level() in latency debugfs files Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 17:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20140513165145.GB16632@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1399991428-32763-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <1399991428-32763-5-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> <20140513164623.GP3908@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A7C6E69D for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140513164623.GP3908@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:46:23PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:30:27PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau > > I prefer "expose foo" and "use foo" in the same patch. I'll squash these > two if you're ok. Sure, no problem. There have been a lot of these in the past, so I was just assuming that was the unspoken way of doing it. I sure don't mind either way. -- Damien