Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-bt8xx: fix compilation warning

["Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

On Wed, 14 May 2014 23:43:36 +0200
abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@gmail.com> wrote:

> this fixes a compilation warning by checking
> the retun value of gpiochip_remove()


Really, I would rather change the gpiochip_remove return type to void.

What is the point of printing a useless error message in case
of a failure and then continuing as always.
This is not fixing a compiler warning, it is a workaround. And a bad one, indeed.

How are we supposed to handle a gpiochip_remove failure correctly
in a pcidev remove handler?


> Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> index ecb3ca2d..5480229 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ static void bt8xxgpio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> -	gpiochip_remove(&bg->gpio);
> +	if (gpiochip_remove(&bg->gpio))
> +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "gpiochip_remove() failed.\n");
>  
>  	bgwrite(0, BT848_INT_MASK);
>  	bgwrite(~0x0, BT848_INT_STAT);




-- 
Michael.

----
Please use PGP/GPG encryption.
Key-ID: F532BE1D908D8B0E
--------

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]