From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (unknown [209.85.215.46]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC264660FD for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ec20so620055lab.19 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 03:21:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7+Z7kKVDPCeHOtZNX1RY/JEOwRTtzeiiBf2V6Z9x+Yo=; b=VO9mu8FPxKPciiu+g+mPlkqFgZY/uibHOose7SkjmQSm7dFGfqBpALpdQFdrY2W0Vg 5YsS4+7tAVYrvCq+RH1GrLeQE8oJ191BQ6tCdQaeqhzeTy4pfUJTpBtnbnBOYdUbGNdG hSFEuFkwrEZ+bNcEVOQOHXHbhWuijbWc7udxGtrytwORUf0lrRj0442SFIdqaR6L85xd 8YUjL9r2etrIL+kNFSCq88P8R08mYjZCPioRA+JlvXn55AZUArndnv0Rgp/YW/DR1Ja5 JOmq2pdH4b2qTq+u9if7POGF5CN3L9O2crYppsMi+6GmqqG1AuqpSPCltHLRLyIDhXp0 7dEw== X-Received: by 10.112.118.197 with SMTP id ko5mr6510578lbb.23.1400149267831; Thu, 15 May 2014 03:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-89-176-104-3.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.104.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm4908061lbr.28.2014.05.15.03.21.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 May 2014 03:21:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:21:36 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Samuel Stirtzel Message-ID: <20140515102136.GB2433@jama> References: <1398698859-15011-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20140504214712.GG2486@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: openembedded-devel Subject: Re: [meta-qt5][PATCH] qtbase.inc: Enable accessibility by default X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:21:10 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 49942 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:16:00AM +0200, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > 2014-05-14 21:04 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador : > > Hello folks, > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Martin Jansa = wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:27:39PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >>>> qtdeclarative requires accessibility to be enabled and it is added by > >>>> default to the toolchain so we ought to have it enabled to ensure the > >>>> default toolchain generation works. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > >> ... > >>> As I told you on gtalk, I would prefer default to stay as minimal as > >>> posible, why don't you change packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target.bb to > >>> use RRECOMMENDS instead of RDEPENDS so that missing > >>> qtquickcontrols-qmlplugins package doesn't break it when it's not > >>> available (because it's empty)? > >> > >> I don't have a strong opinion for either case however I think we ought > >> to know what other meta-qt5 users think about it. > >> > >> In support to this patch addition I think we ought to provide the most > >> used features of Qt5 working out of box to users have a good first > >> use. Special cases can customize it per need basis. I think QML is > >> common enough for us to provide full support for it by default. > > > > > > Martin and I have different views on this topic and I'd like to merge > > or drop this patch. Could people comment on this one? > > >=20 >=20 > We may want to be able to let the user choose between 2 flavors of Qt. >=20 > One of them could be a standard Qt (which is what I use), other users > seem to prefer a stripped down version with some features switched > off. >=20 > As 'Giuseppe D'Angelo ' noted on qt-interest [= 1]: > "Apart from this: builds with feature switches are not really tested, > so I'm not surprised that [there are combinations that don't even > build]. But we totally welcome patches that would fix such builds." >=20 > So IMO it would be a good idea to have a constantly tested low > footprint version. >=20 > There is no one size fits all in this case, but can we provide 2 > versions that work for 99% of the users? What you mean by 2 versions here? There is simple PACKAGECONFIG option to enable more features (most people will probably enable icu, gl* and accessibility). But we don't want 2 qtbase recipes one with more PACKAGECONFIG options enabled and other with more disabled. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlN0lTAACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByZsACgjGwv9rVluveLaQ3qaYjbouI3 wPYAniWnio4ClVm4zK+rWYF6aPiWdDSs =2qWV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro--