All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: famz@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: zero-initialize all QMP command parameters
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:27:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521092747.2deeffb3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400606439-19899-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 20 May 2014 12:20:39 -0500
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> In general QMP command parameter values are specified by consumers of the
> QMP/HMP interface, but in the case of optional parameters these values may
> be left uninitialized.
> 
> It is considered a bug for code to make use of optional parameters that have
> not been flagged as being present by the marshalling code (via corresponding
> has_<parameter> parameter), however our marshalling code will still pass
> these uninitialized values on to the corresponding QMP function (to then
> be ignored). Some compilers (clang in particular) consider this unsafe
> however, and generate warnings as a result. As reported by Peter Maydell:
> 
>   This is something clang's -fsanitize=undefined spotted. The
>   code generated by qapi-commands.py in qmp-marshal.c for
>   qmp_marshal_* functions where there are some optional
>   arguments looks like this:
> 
>       bool has_force = false;
>       bool force;
> 
>       mi = qmp_input_visitor_new_strict(QOBJECT(args));
>       v = qmp_input_get_visitor(mi);
>       visit_type_str(v, &device, "device", errp);
>       visit_start_optional(v, &has_force, "force", errp);
>       if (has_force) {
>           visit_type_bool(v, &force, "force", errp);
>       }
>       visit_end_optional(v, errp);
>       qmp_input_visitor_cleanup(mi);
> 
>       if (error_is_set(errp)) {
>           goto out;
>       }
>       qmp_eject(device, has_force, force, errp);
> 
>   In the case where has_force is false, we never initialize
>   force, but then we use it by passing it to qmp_eject.
>   I imagine we don't then actually use the value, but clang
>   complains in particular for 'bool' variables because the value
>   that ends up being loaded from memory for 'force' is not either
>   0 or 1 (being uninitialized stack contents).
> 
> Fix this by initializing all QMP command parameters to {0} in the
> marshalling code prior to passing them on to the QMP functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/qapi-commands.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied to the qmp branch, thanks.

> 
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-commands.py b/scripts/qapi-commands.py
> index 386f17e..7d93d01 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi-commands.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi-commands.py
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ bool has_%(argname)s = false;
>                           argname=c_var(argname), argtype=c_type(argtype))
>          else:
>              ret += mcgen('''
> -%(argtype)s %(argname)s;
> +%(argtype)s %(argname)s = {0};
>  ''',
>                           argname=c_var(argname), argtype=c_type(argtype))
>  

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-21 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-20 17:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: zero-initialize all QMP command parameters Michael Roth
2014-05-20 17:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-05-20 18:21 ` Peter Maydell
2014-05-20 18:41   ` Michael Roth
2014-05-21 13:27 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140521092747.2deeffb3@redhat.com \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.