All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: bcm590xx: add support for GPLDO and VBUS regulators
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521133038.GJ6679@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140521120257.GV32082@beef>

> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > index dfadaaa..066adfb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > @@ -70,5 +70,26 @@
> > >  
> > >  		vsr_reg: vsr {
> > >  		};
> > > +
> > > +		gpldo1_reg: gpldo1 {
> > > +		};
> > 
> > What do these empty nodes do in any case?
> 
> They instantiate regulators. The bcm590xx binding specifies the
> allowable subnode names permitted here. This replaces the old method
> of specifying an index or the deprecated regulator-compatible property.
> The board-specific dts includes this dtsi and applies any board
> constraints to a subset of regulators that need them. Unused regulators
> are all disabled which is what we want.
> 
> > Don't you at least need a status property in there or something?
> 
> Not necessary for these subnodes.

Very well, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>
Cc: Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>,
	Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: bcm590xx: add support for GPLDO and VBUS regulators
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521133038.GJ6679@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140521120257.GV32082@beef>

> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > index dfadaaa..066adfb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi
> > > @@ -70,5 +70,26 @@
> > >  
> > >  		vsr_reg: vsr {
> > >  		};
> > > +
> > > +		gpldo1_reg: gpldo1 {
> > > +		};
> > 
> > What do these empty nodes do in any case?
> 
> They instantiate regulators. The bcm590xx binding specifies the
> allowable subnode names permitted here. This replaces the old method
> of specifying an index or the deprecated regulator-compatible property.
> The board-specific dts includes this dtsi and applies any board
> constraints to a subset of regulators that need them. Unused regulators
> are all disabled which is what we want.
> 
> > Don't you at least need a status property in there or something?
> 
> Not necessary for these subnodes.

Very well, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-21 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 23:21 [PATCH v2 0/4] Support additional regulators on BCM590xx Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21 ` Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21 ` Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: bcm590xx: update binding with additional BCM59056 regulators Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21   ` Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21   ` Matt Porter
2014-04-28 11:56   ` Lee Jones
2014-04-28 11:56     ` Lee Jones
2014-04-28 11:56     ` Lee Jones
2014-04-28 14:09     ` Matt Porter
2014-04-28 14:09       ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 16:11       ` Lee Jones
2014-05-20 16:11         ` Lee Jones
2014-05-20 16:11         ` Lee Jones
2014-05-20 19:00         ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 19:00           ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 19:00           ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 20:29           ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 20:29             ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 20:29             ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 21:44             ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 21:44               ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 21:44               ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 21:57               ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 21:57                 ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 21:57                 ` Matt Porter
2014-05-20 22:17                 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-20 22:17                   ` Mark Brown
2014-05-21  9:26                   ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21  9:26                     ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21  9:26                     ` Lee Jones
2014-04-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: bcm590xx: add support for regulators on secondary I2C slave Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21   ` Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21   ` Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: bcm590xx: add support for GPLDO and VBUS regulators Matt Porter
2014-04-23 23:21   ` Matt Porter
2014-05-21  9:29   ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21  9:29     ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21  9:29     ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21 12:02     ` Matt Porter
2014-05-21 12:02       ` Matt Porter
2014-05-21 12:02       ` Matt Porter
2014-05-21 13:30       ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-05-21 13:30         ` Lee Jones
2014-05-23 12:09   ` Matt Porter
2014-05-23 12:09     ` Matt Porter
2014-05-23 12:09     ` Matt Porter
2014-05-21  9:48 ` [GIT PULL] mfd: Second IB for Mark (regulator) Lee Jones
2014-05-21  9:48   ` Lee Jones
2014-05-21 23:18   ` Mark Brown
2014-05-21 23:18     ` Mark Brown
2014-05-21 23:18     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140521133038.GJ6679@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.