From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Roy Franz <roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:47:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523134720.GA9256@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140523131656.GR4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: efi: only attempt efi map setup if booting via EFI
>
> Booting a kernel with CONFIG_EFI enabled on a non-EFI system caused
> an oops with the current UEFI support code.
> Add the required test to prevent this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> index 7bfd650..14db1f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
>
> void __init efi_idmap_init(void)
> {
> + if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> + return;
> +
That's a first (possibly temporary) step and I think it's fine:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
But we need some further tweaking to the way we call efi_init().
Currently it doesn't matter whether Linux booted as an EFI application
or not and efi_init() is always called, causing some pr_err() in
fdt_find_uefi_params(). It's not really an error as we support the same
image booting non-EFI as well.
Can we add another of detecting whether it's an EFI application and
avoid calling efi_init()? I can see x86 sets some efi_loader_signature
string in exit_boot() and checks against it later when calling
efi_init().
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:47:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523134720.GA9256@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140523131656.GR4179@bivouac.eciton.net>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: efi: only attempt efi map setup if booting via EFI
>
> Booting a kernel with CONFIG_EFI enabled on a non-EFI system caused
> an oops with the current UEFI support code.
> Add the required test to prevent this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> index 7bfd650..14db1f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
>
> void __init efi_idmap_init(void)
> {
> + if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> + return;
> +
That's a first (possibly temporary) step and I think it's fine:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
But we need some further tweaking to the way we call efi_init().
Currently it doesn't matter whether Linux booted as an EFI application
or not and efi_init() is always called, causing some pr_err() in
fdt_find_uefi_params(). It's not really an error as we support the same
image booting non-EFI as well.
Can we add another of detecting whether it's an EFI application and
avoid calling efi_init()? I can see x86 sets some efi_loader_signature
string in exit_boot() and checks against it later when calling
efi_init().
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 9:45 EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64 Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140523094513.GC9252-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 13:16 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 13:16 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <20140523131656.GR4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 13:24 ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-23 13:24 ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-23 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-05-23 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140523134720.GA9256-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 15:03 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 15:03 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <20140523150331.GS4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-23 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu-4ExoNfGVJzUK4v06XD5V3nYfRetoefY0RuFsN1CUOzg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 15:45 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 15:45 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <20140523154551.GT4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-23 18:03 ` Roy Franz
2014-05-23 18:03 ` Roy Franz
2014-05-23 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-23 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-28 15:59 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-28 15:59 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20140528155931.GA20523-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-28 18:05 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-28 18:05 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <20140528180525.GU4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-28 18:40 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-28 18:40 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20140528184043.GB20523-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-28 20:42 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-28 20:42 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-07-08 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-08 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140708092100.GA21320-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-08 11:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-07-08 11:09 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140523134720.GA9256@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.