All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20140523134720.GA9256@arm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e6a7195..1687ef3 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
 > an oops with the current UEFI support code.
 > Add the required test to prevent this.
 > 
-> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
+> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
 > ---
 >  arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c |    3 +++
 >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
 
 That's a first (possibly temporary) step and I think it's fine:
 
-Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
+Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
 
 But we need some further tweaking to the way we call efi_init().
 Currently it doesn't matter whether Linux booted as an EFI application
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 1a8ca93..9d059ce 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,14 +1,9 @@
  "ref\020140523094513.GC9252@arm.com\0"
  "ref\020140523131656.GR4179@bivouac.eciton.net\0"
- "ref\020140523131656.GR4179-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64\0"
+ "From\0catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)\0"
+ "Subject\0EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 23 May 2014 14:47:20 +0100\0"
- "To\0Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Roy Franz <roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>"
-  linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
- " Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:\n"
@@ -18,7 +13,7 @@
  "> an oops with the current UEFI support code.\n"
  "> Add the required test to prevent this.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ "> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>\n"
  "> ---\n"
  ">  arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c |    3 +++\n"
  ">  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)\n"
@@ -37,7 +32,7 @@
  "\n"
  "That's a first (possibly temporary) step and I think it's fine:\n"
  "\n"
- "Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ "Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>\n"
  "\n"
  "But we need some further tweaking to the way we call efi_init().\n"
  "Currently it doesn't matter whether Linux booted as an EFI application\n"
@@ -53,4 +48,4 @@
  "-- \n"
  Catalin
 
-9a61b316923930826d660497cb226c2a872fc3159dee151283d33c6acd0c9f79
+535b9af1947f3253ec5e9032eea934d8a5e37f25402d0603223c9d80bc887de0

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.