From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752514AbaEZOCx (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 10:02:53 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:32845 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752304AbaEZOCw (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 10:02:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:02:44 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Linux Kernel , duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, fabf@skynet.be Subject: Re: kernel-doc (was Re: + lib-digsigc-kernel-doc-warning-fixes.patch added to -mm tree) Message-ID: <20140526140244.GC22284@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Alexey Dobriyan , Linux Kernel , duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, fabf@skynet.be References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:27:04PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:28 PM, wrote: > > * digsig_verify() - digital signature verification with public key > > * @keyring: keyring to search key in > > * @sig: digital signature > > - * @sigen: length of the signature > > + * @siglen: length of the signature > > * @data: data > > * @datalen: length of the data > > Does anyone use kernel-doc generated documentation? > I'm serious. The kernel-doc generated documentation is available on the web, and I suspect a number of people find it when they run Google Searches. The danger of course is that they might get documentation which is out of sync with the upstream kernel (or whatever kernel they are developing against), but I know I've found it useful on occasion. - Ted