From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Libo Chen <libo.chen@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: balance storm
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:13:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140527131325.GF5444@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53848B38.5090408@huawei.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:55:20PM +0800, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2014/5/27 17:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > In any case, I'm not sure what the 'regression' report is against, as
> > there's only a single kernel version mentioned: 3.4, and that's almost a
> upstream has the same problem, I have mentioned before.
Not on anything that landed in my inbox I think, but that's not the
point. For a regression report you need _2_ kernel versions, one with
and one without the 'problem'.
Providing one (or two) that have a problem doesn't qualify.
In any case, I didn't see the original email, but I got the impression
that it was complaining about 'new' behaviour from the bits I did see as
quoted.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-27 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 3:04 balance storm Libo Chen
2014-05-26 5:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-26 12:16 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-26 14:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 7:56 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 9:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 12:50 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 13:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-28 1:04 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-28 1:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-28 6:54 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-28 8:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-28 9:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-28 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-28 11:43 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-28 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-29 7:58 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-29 7:57 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-28 1:06 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-26 7:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-26 11:49 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-26 14:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 7:44 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 8:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 10:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 10:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-27 12:56 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 12:55 ` Libo Chen
2014-05-27 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140527131325.GF5444@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=libo.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.