From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752350AbaE0NmH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 09:42:07 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59876 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752047AbaE0NmC (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 09:42:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:41:56 +0200 From: Torsten Duwe To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Matt Mackall , Herbert Xu , Arnd Bergmann , Rusty Russell , Satoru Takeuchi , ingo.tuchscherer@de.ibm.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hans-Georg Markgraf , Gerald Schaefer , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Joe Perches Subject: [PATCH v5 00/03]: hwrng: an in-kernel rngd Message-ID: <20140527134156.GA14099@lst.de> References: <20140321142950.GI1763@lst.de> <20140321143342.GK1763@lst.de> <533375C1.5060904@mit.edu> <158d2776-1ea4-4f32-a9e9-0488047e6b70@email.android.com> <20140414160211.GE711@lst.de> <20140414160653.GC29351@lst.de> <20140415085126.GA17327@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:53:53AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > You're right. Would anyone object to call it "quality", as in RX signal quality? > > In context of a random source that is pretty accurate, I'd say. Other opinions? > > I'm okay with "quality", although I'm still partial to "entropy_per_1000bits". So, since there were no other comments, here's v5 with aforementioned change. Default is still "off". Patch 02/03 de-fuzzed for 3.15. Torsten