From: James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org>
To: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mwifiex: block work queue while suspended
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:49:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528044945.GI4151@us.netrek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F70F5E4B3@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:35:21PM -0700, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > > > We use a GPIO to wake from WLAN.
> > >
> > > This doesn't match the gpio parameter configured in hscfg command
> > > 0xe5.
> >
> > You're right, and I'm quite wrong. Sorry about that. I misread our
> > code.
> >
> > Correction, we use SDIO to wake from WLAN.
> >
> > We set gap to 0xff, which we think is a special value that means the
> > device will wait for the host to acknowledge before sending data to
> > the host.
>
> Yes, gap=0xff should be used. Actually I also have the patch to set
> gap to 0xff queued in my local tree. I will send it upstream.
Thanks. Today I have been testing with gap 50ms and no longer able to
reproduce the "mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt." problem.
> > Looking through history of development, we thought that this would
> > avoid a race condition, where the host starts to suspend, configures
> > the device for host sleep, but the device may wake in the time before
> > the host suspends.
> >
> > We don't see this "mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt."
> > problem unless we use WPA2. It does not reproduce on an open access
> > point.
>
> With WPA2 enabled, does the "mmc0 timeout" happen in every suspend
> attempt?
No, it is rare, of the order of one in every 6000 attempts, and depends
on the timing of arriving packets. Our reproducer uses a ping ramp,
with interval varying from 0.1 to 0.9 seconds with 50ms increment, and
this brings the problem frequency down to about one in 200 attempts.
The OLPC XO-4 by default tries to suspend automatically when user is
idle, which is why we notice the problem.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 1:24 [RFC] mwifiex: block work queue while suspended James Cameron
2014-05-22 3:50 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-22 5:46 ` James Cameron
2014-05-23 4:12 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-26 8:01 ` James Cameron
2014-05-27 23:39 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-28 2:01 ` James Cameron
2014-05-28 4:35 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-28 4:49 ` James Cameron [this message]
2014-05-28 5:04 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-29 1:22 ` James Cameron
2014-05-29 2:10 ` Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528044945.GI4151@us.netrek.org \
--to=quozl@laptop.org \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.