From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:07:01 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20140530150701.GA4281@fancy-poultry.org> References: <1401370403.94216.YahooMailNeo@web172002.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20140529201335.GA9014@tansi.org> <20140530134238.GA21698@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Is erasing hard disk drive mandatory? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 30.05.2014, Stephen Cousins wrote: > I see. So it has nothing to do with how well the data is encrypted. Just > another level of protection.. Maybe. I think the practical effects are negligible. With the first minutes of use of such a disk, temporary files get written to it, files get deleted, new ones get written and old stuff gets overwritten. If the encryption is secure, all that doesn't really matter.