From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:10:53 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20140530171053.GA5729@fancy-poultry.org> References: <1401370403.94216.YahooMailNeo@web172002.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20140529201335.GA9014@tansi.org> <20140530134238.GA21698@tansi.org> <20140530150701.GA4281@fancy-poultry.org> <5388AA9C.3020909@codehawks.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5388AA9C.3020909@codehawks.eu> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Is erasing hard disk drive mandatory? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 30.05.2014, Thomas Bastiani wrote: > On SSD's though, this would prevent TRIM from functioning properly > and make the SSD appear as full to the controller which would > hurt performance. If you e.g. do a "dd if=/dev/urandom of=bigfile" to a SSD drive until the partition is fully overwritten, simply deleting "bigfile" followed by a "fstrim" should restore performance to the same level as is was before. What am I missing?