Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

[josh@joshtriplett.org]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon,  2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
> >>>  
> >>>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
> >>>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> +R:	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> >>>  L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>>  S:	Supported
> >>>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> >>
> >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel
> >> change is useful.
> >>
> >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more
> >> meaning and hence is probably better.
> >>
> >> But why not "Cc:"?  That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
> 
> Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not?

Not sure what you mean here.  Responding to the text you quoted: I have
no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and
can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.

- Josh Triplett