All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 77221] New: Clear tx_flags when transhdrlen == 0 in ip_append_data without checking?
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:33:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140603083306.40ff45ee@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:46:20 -0700
From: "bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>
To: "stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [Bug 77221] New: Clear tx_flags when transhdrlen == 0 in ip_append_data without checking?


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77221

            Bug ID: 77221
           Summary: Clear tx_flags when transhdrlen == 0 in ip_append_data
                    without checking?
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 3.14
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: IPV4
          Assignee: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
          Reporter: yangzhe1990@gmail.com
        Regression: No

Hi,

While I was tracing why TX_TIMESTAMP won't work with RAW socket and
Non-privileged ICMP socket, I found that both raw.c and ping.c call
ip_append_data with transhdrlen set to 0, and in ip_append_data, there are
timestamp specific 

924                                 else
925                                         /* only the initial fragment is
926                                            time stamped */
927                                         cork->tx_flags = 0;

To my understanding in ping.c transhdrlen should be set to sizeof(struct
icmphdr) just like what icmp.c did.

And for RAW socket, since there are no concept of fragmentation, should we
check the protocol and only set cork->tx_flags = 0 when the socket_type !=
SOCK_RAW

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2014-06-03 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140603083306.40ff45ee@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.