From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ima_mmap_file returning 0 to userspace as mmap result.
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:56:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606015610.GA23041@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402019369.5458.55.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:49:29PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > > There's no mention of this return value in the man page, so I dug
> > > > > into the kernel code, and it appears that we do..
> > > > >
> > > > > sys_mmap
> > > > > vm_mmap_pgoff
> > > > > security_mmap_file
> > > > > ima_file_mmap <- returns 0 if not PROT_EXEC
> > > > >
> > > > > and then the 0 gets propagated up as a retval all the way to userspace.
> > >
> > > I just realised that this affects even kernels with CONFIG_IMA unset,
> > > because there we just do 'return 0' unconditionally.
> > >
> > > Also, it appears that kernels with CONFIG_SECURITY unset will also
> > > return a zero for the same reason.
> >
> > Hang on, I was misreading that whole security_mmap_file ret handling code.
> > There's something else at work here. I'll dig and get a reproducer.
>
> According to security.h, it should return 0 if permission is granted.
> If IMA is not enabled, it should also return 0. What exactly is the
> problem?
Still digging. I managed to get this to reproduce constantly last night,
but no luck today. From re-reading the code though, I think IMA/lsm isn't
the problem.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ima_mmap_file returning 0 to userspace as mmap result.
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:56:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606015610.GA23041@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402019369.5458.55.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:49:29PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > > There's no mention of this return value in the man page, so I dug
> > > > > into the kernel code, and it appears that we do..
> > > > >
> > > > > sys_mmap
> > > > > vm_mmap_pgoff
> > > > > security_mmap_file
> > > > > ima_file_mmap <- returns 0 if not PROT_EXEC
> > > > >
> > > > > and then the 0 gets propagated up as a retval all the way to userspace.
> > >
> > > I just realised that this affects even kernels with CONFIG_IMA unset,
> > > because there we just do 'return 0' unconditionally.
> > >
> > > Also, it appears that kernels with CONFIG_SECURITY unset will also
> > > return a zero for the same reason.
> >
> > Hang on, I was misreading that whole security_mmap_file ret handling code.
> > There's something else at work here. I'll dig and get a reproducer.
>
> According to security.h, it should return 0 if permission is granted.
> If IMA is not enabled, it should also return 0. What exactly is the
> problem?
Still digging. I managed to get this to reproduce constantly last night,
but no luck today. From re-reading the code though, I think IMA/lsm isn't
the problem.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 23:31 ima_mmap_file returning 0 to userspace as mmap result Dave Jones
2014-06-04 23:31 ` Dave Jones
2014-06-05 4:40 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-05 4:40 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-05 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2014-06-05 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2014-06-05 16:20 ` Dave Jones
2014-06-05 16:20 ` Dave Jones
2014-06-06 1:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-06 1:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-06 1:56 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-06-06 1:56 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140606015610.GA23041@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.