From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] block: Deprecate the use of the term sector in the context of block integrity Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:45:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20140611164538.GA9511@infradead.org> References: <1401334128-15499-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <1401334128-15499-6-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:54257 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015AbaFKQpo (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:45:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1401334128-15499-6-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: axboe@fb.com, nab@daterainc.com, sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:39PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > The protection interval is not necessarily tied to the logical block > size of a block device. Stop using the terms sector and sectors. This does more than just renaming symbols, so it needs a better description or even better splitting into separate patches.