From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9C8F0E00B67; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (martin.jansa[at]gmail.com) * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E77BE00B5D for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id n15so592932wiw.17 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:54:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GcN3PVDbp7dI836P4TNYQqljdJvHLrCLJNck+ovq6Cc=; b=eSx/cHKdJVDLskZB8njIgl+oXAWry1TCjtTC1v086NgTuX+N/6aM0S1rAKwFfAs5Id Vfyv3u3lCJbt7nrvhHCZLR+hXmSWPg9/Yx51nCjYkvdSzydlmSMlFuO5DyGMG5EC6j4o eS+3mfvM9IcKyHJ/StU8nzDX4DQcn39AjbUVD6ymLLl2yuHhlRgC18q2N3VcZvMQUNDv 5cQFaq2qj60VTeC+68/0EcS6NlLCd4hV9VLPF7wQY8sjDJ8i50ZLzynvqZWa6TxUhzBG Rl5pTPHcu6JLEXRaFAq2M8xnTCjFSL/0P1QMiTCL1FGOLgI0oG9In7Bbp/1CqunyyVIj ZEUw== X-Received: by 10.180.207.9 with SMTP id ls9mr2543499wic.32.1403078063732; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-89-176-104-3.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.104.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm3710894eef.5.2014.06.18.00.54.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:54:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:54:22 +0200 To: "yaoxp@cn.fujitsu.com" Message-ID: <20140618075422.GD2117@jama> References: <1402543617-25861-1-git-send-email-yaoxp@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140612085627.GD2428@jama> <9AD1F2A584A7644C9605656D538412FEAA5B8F@G08CNEXMBPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9AD1F2A584A7644C9605656D538412FEAA5B8F@G08CNEXMBPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] add recipe cim-schema, cim-schema-docs and license file DMTF. X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:54:36 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 20214 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A" Content-Disposition: inline --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:30:49AM +0000, yaoxp@cn.fujitsu.com wrote: > Why not in oe-core? > What recipe can be put in oe-core, and what recipe can be put in meta-oe? "core" recipes which are used by most if not all OE builds "opt-in" extra recipes go to different "topic" layers nobody needed or asked for cim until now, so it's not "core" by this definition. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.burton@intel.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 5:27 PM > > To: Yao, Xinpan > > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org > > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH] add recipe cim-schema, cim-schema-docs and > > license file DMTF. > >=20 > > On 12 June 2014 09:56, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Why is this recipe needed in oe-core layer? Wouldn't meta-networking > > > be more suitable? > > > > > > The patch also belongs to oe-core ML not yocto. > >=20 > > Agreed, unless there's a strong reason then this should go to meta-netw= orking > > (so send to the openembedded-devel list). > >=20 > > Ross > --=20 > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOhRa4ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwsywCgkKgRXJDg/D9zLhy7PGGTHBtn 4TEAoIiM5N6IDgrXTlFehq1VEn0nnc/E =Lps3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A--