From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com
Subject: data=journal regressions in 3.16-rc1
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:24:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140623202404.GA16979@wallace> (raw)
My regression test results for 3.16-rc1 on x86_64 show three new xfstests
failures since 3.15 final when running on an ext4 filesystem mounted with the
data=journal and block_validity mount options (xfstests-bld's data_journal
scenario). These are generic/075, /112, and /231. All three tests fail
consistently.
These failures bisect to this kernel patch:
7fc34a62ca mm/msync.c: sync only the requested range in msync()
These failures also appear when running on 3.16-rc2, and disappear if the
aforementioned patch is reverted. I've not seen the failures in any of the
other test scenarios I've run on 3.16-rc1 (4k, ext3, nojournal, etc.).
No error messages appear in the kernel log, and not a lot useful is reported
when a test fails. Just for reference, here's the result of a generic/075
failure:
generic/075 62s ... [15:33:07] [15:33:09] [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//generic/075.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/075.out 2014-06-16 13:14:27.233891460 -0400
+++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/075.out.bad 2014-06-23 15:33:09.654212783 -0400
@@ -4,15 +4,5 @@
-----------------------------------------------
fsx.0 : -d -N numops -S 0
-----------------------------------------------
-
------------------------------------------------
-fsx.1 : -d -N numops -S 0 -x
------------------------------------------------
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/generic/075.out /root/xfstests/results//generic/075.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/075
Failures: generic/075
Failed 1 of 1 tests
And the contents of xfstests/results/generic/075.out.bad:
QA output created by 075
brevity is wit...
-----------------------------------------------
fsx.0 : -d -N numops -S 0
-----------------------------------------------
fsx (-d -N 1000 -S 0) failed, 0 - compare /root/xfstests/results//generic/075.0.{good,bad,fsxlog}
od: /root/xfstests/results//generic/075.0.fsxgood: No such file or directory
Additional test configuration info:
e2fsprogs master branch: bb9cca2ca9
xfstests master branch: 45d1fac130
Perhaps data=journal has an unexpected dependency on the old msync behavior,
given the patch comment?
Thanks,
Eric
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 20:24 Eric Whitney [this message]
2014-06-23 21:11 ` data=journal regressions in 3.16-rc1 Wilcox, Matthew R
2014-06-23 21:55 ` Eric Whitney
2014-06-26 15:12 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-27 4:20 ` Namjae Jeon
2014-06-27 6:03 ` Namjae Jeon
2014-06-27 10:48 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-06-27 11:14 ` Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140623202404.GA16979@wallace \
--to=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.