From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43702)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzFFX-00059v-D1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:10:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzFFR-0004DF-AX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:10:15 -0400
Received: from [58.251.49.30] (port=37288 helo=mail.sangfor.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzFFP-0003m7-OH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:10:09 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:08:56 +0800
From: "Zhang Haoyu" <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
Message-ID: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Michael S.Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

Hi, all

Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
Any advices?

Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu